{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Meu site jur\u00eddico","provider_url":"https:\/\/meusitejuridico.com.br","author_name":"Rodrigo Leite","author_url":"https:\/\/meusitejuridico.com.br\/author\/rodrigoleiterodrigoleite\/","title":"Resumo - Informativo 1.054 do STF, de 20 de maio de 2022 - Meu site jur\u00eddico","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KtyxUhaEs2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/meusitejuridico.com.br\/2022\/05\/25\/resumo-informativo-1-054-do-stf-de-20-de-maio-de-2022\/\">Resumo &#8211; Informativo 1.054 do STF, de 20 de maio de 2022<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/meusitejuridico.com.br\/2022\/05\/25\/resumo-informativo-1-054-do-stf-de-20-de-maio-de-2022\/embed\/#?secret=KtyxUhaEs2\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Resumo &#8211; Informativo 1.054 do STF, de 20 de maio de 2022&#8221; &#8212; Meu site jur\u00eddico\" data-secret=\"KtyxUhaEs2\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/meusitejuridico.editorajuspodivm.com.br\/s.meusitejuridico\/2020\/07\/ee654a7c-books.jpg","thumbnail_width":400,"thumbnail_height":266,"description":"PLEN\u00c1RIO &#8211; \u00c9 inconstitucional lei estadual que isenta servidores p\u00fablicos da taxa de inscri\u00e7\u00e3o em concursos p\u00fablicos promovidos pela Administra\u00e7\u00e3o P\u00fablica local, privilegiando, sem justificativa razo\u00e1vel para tanto, um grupo mais favorecido social e economicamente \u2013 ADI 5818\/CE e ADI 3918\/SE, julgamento finalizado em 13\/05\/2022. &#8211; \u00c0 luz do art. 227 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o Federal, que [&hellip;]"}