<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Meu site jur&#xED;dico</provider_name><provider_url>https://meusitejuridico.com.br</provider_url><author_name>Rodrigo Leite</author_name><author_url>https://meusitejuridico.com.br/author/rodrigoleiterodrigoleite/</author_url><title>Resumo - Informativo 838 do STJ, de 4 de fevereiro de 2025 - Meu site jur&#xED;dico</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="r6gYIArDfV"&gt;&lt;a href="https://meusitejuridico.com.br/2025/02/12/resumo-informativo-838-do-stj-de-4-de-fevereiro-de-2025/"&gt;Resumo &#x2013; Informativo 838 do STJ, de 4 de fevereiro de 2025&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://meusitejuridico.com.br/2025/02/12/resumo-informativo-838-do-stj-de-4-de-fevereiro-de-2025/embed/#?secret=r6gYIArDfV" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Resumo &#x2013; Informativo 838 do STJ, de 4 de fevereiro de 2025&#x201D; &#x2014; Meu site jur&#xED;dico" data-secret="r6gYIArDfV" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script&gt;
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://meusitejuridico.editorajuspodivm.com.br/s.meusitejuridico/2018/12/e30860b0-whatsapp-image-2018-12-05-at-155131.jpeg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1280</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>853</thumbnail_height><description>PRIMEIRA TURMA &#x2013; A norma espec&#xED;fica inserida no microssistema de tutela coletiva, prevendo a impugna&#xE7;&#xE3;o de decis&#xF5;es interlocut&#xF3;rias mediante agravo de instrumento (art. 19 da Lei n. 4.717/1965), n&#xE3;o &#xE9; afastada pelo rol taxativo do art. 1.015 do CPC/2015, uma vez que o inciso XIII desse artigo contempla o cabimento do agravo em outros casos [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
